Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Accelerated Aging of Medical Devices | Part 2: Relative Humidity and Absolute Humidity

Temperature is not the only variable to consider when defining accelerated aging parameters. Humidity must also be considered.  Notice that I only say humidity.  There is absolute humidity and relative humidity (%RH).
  • Most people are familiar with %RH, which measures how close the water vapor content of the air is to saturation (raining) at a given temperature
    • RH is temperature dependent! 
    • Typical temp/RH probes output %RH based upon the temperature they measure, because of this set point must be defined in %RH
  • Absolute humidity measures the amount of water water in the air per volume of air and is typically measured in g/m^3 or PPMv (parts per million volume). 
    • Absolute humidity is NOT temperature dependent


Why is humidity important for accelerated aging if it is not part of the Arrhenius equation?

  • Incorrectly chosen humidity can cause faster aging than calculated by the standard Arrhenius equation
    • Too high or too low can result in faster aging depending on the materials involved
  • Poorly controlled humidity can also result in deviations to the Arrhenius calculated aging
    • ASTM F1980 recommends ± 5% RH (relative humidity) for accelerating aging limits 


How can high and low humidity levels affect product during accelerated aging?

High humidity can cause the following:
  • Hydrolysis, which is material degradation in the presence of water 
    • Think about how some materials (salt for instance) dissolve when placed in water
    • Also think about how elevated temperature results in quicker or more complete dissolving 
  • Degradation of any water soluble or water activated components
Low humidity can cause the following:
  • Oxidation
  • Ozone degradation (Ozonolysis)
  • Drying/cracking of materials with variable moisture content
    • Nylon and natural rubber are examples of materials with significantly variable moisture content

So at both ends of the humidity spectrum there can be unintended effects on the Arrhenius aging calculation.  The key point is to discuss with your materials engineer or expert which type of failures your materials are most likely to have.

If you have a device/package with both, I may consider performing half your aging at high humidity and half at low humidity to verify the design at the extremes it will see during its shelf life. 


How are absolute humidity and relative humidity different?

As stated earlier the key difference between relative humidity and absolute humidity is that relatively humidity is temperature dependent while absolute humidity is not. 

Below is a graph of how absolute humidity increases with temperature (25-60°C) at 50% RH. 

Plot of absolute humidity (g/m^3) with increasing temperature at 50% RH


What's important to notice about the above graph?
  • The absolute humidity at 60°C is than the standard conditions (25°C / 50% RH)
    • It's actually 5.6 times higher, which a huge difference in the intended amount of available moisture in the air
  • If we calculate the %RH at 25°C based upon that at 60°C / 50% RH we obtain 282%, which means there is almost 3 times as much moisture in the aging chamber air than would be required to generate rain at room temperature
    • I don't think the intent is to have devices/packages submerged in hot water during storage (water vapor passes through packaging for EO sterilization)

So given that keeping %RH constant at elevated temperatures increases the absolute humidity we will need to reduce the %RH set point as the aging temperature is increased as shown in the figure below.

Plot of constant absolute humidity for standard conditions of 25°C @ 15% (green), 50% (blue) and 85% (red) RH



What can be done to properly account for humidity when selecting accelerated aging parameters?

1 | Determine the device/package storage conditions
  • Controlled Storage
    • Use temperature/RH monitoring records from the facility over 1 year to calculate the min, max, mean and standard deviation in temperature and absolute humidity measured
    • If data is not available, then a reasonable assumption for room temperature controlled storage is 50% RH at 25°C (standard temperature)  
  • Uncontrolled Storage 
    • Use temperature/RH monitoring records from the facility over 1 year to calculate the min, max, mean and standard deviation in temperature and absolute humidity measured
    • If data is not available
      • Obtain data from a local environmental monitoring station (if calibrated)
      • A reasonable assumption for the low/high RH bounds could be 15/85% RH at 25°C

2 | Calculate the absolute humidity based upon the determined %RH value at 25°C (or other standard temperature)
  • Create a table using a calculator from a calibrated probe vendor to determine the absolute humidity for the standard conditions AND the selected aging temperature (see figure below)
    • Rotronic 
    • Vaisala
    • Note: Typical Temp/RH probes do not account for pressure (altitude) in their calculations of RH, which means you can use an standard pressure (1013.25 hPa) within these calculators consistently and obtain relevant results.  
Table of relative humidity set points for a given absolute humidity at 25°C and 15/50/85% RH
    • Create a spreadsheet based upon accepted formulas AND validate it
      • Vaisala has a great white paper on the relevant formulas available here
      • Going into the details of how to create such a spreadsheet is extensive enough for another post, which I will complete and link if enough interest is generated

    3 | Perform your aging study at the calculated set points and appropriate control limits



    Closing Remarks

    I hope this has been informative and has help you gain some insight into the importance of humidity when aging devices/packages.  Please feel free to leave comments, questions or suggestions below. 

    Thursday, August 14, 2014

    Accelerated Aging of Medical Devices | Part 1: Aging Temperature and Duration

    Accelerated aging is probably not everyone's favorite med device topic, but it's one I enjoy.  Accelerated aging allows medical devices to enter the market before real-time data is available.  Accelerated aging is also known as shelf life, stability, or expiry dating testing.  ASTM F1980 is often the reference that guides this type of testing.

    Accelerated aging is an area that each person involved in the product development process should have at least a high level understanding of because it is often on the critical path for new products and design changes.  

    The importance of accelerated aging
    • Overall, choosing the right aging temperature will avoid the timeline killer of redoing aging 
      • Improper aging temperatures can cause changes that would not be seen under normal storage conditions.  
      • Having a proper understanding of how temperature can affect materials and products will ensure the fastest time to market.   
    • Alternatively, aging can be performed at multiple temperatures if data supporting the thermal thresholds of the relevant materials is not readily available or is not known. 

    Selecting an Aging Temperature
    Below are the main guidelines that should be used when selecting an aging temperature.  Consult your internal (or external) materials expert if you're unsure if your materials will not undergo abnormal material transitions during aging.  
    • Ensure material thermal transitions are not reached.  This includes:
      • Glass transition temperature
      • Melting temperature
      • Heat distortion temperature
    •  Evaluate all the materials as a finished product:
      • Processing (molding, extruding, thermoforming, etc) could have an effect on thermal transitions.  If you need to your material test it after processing.
    • The material in your product with the lowest thermal transition should govern your accelerated aging temperature (TAA

    Calculating Aging Duration
    In general, the Arrhenius Equation is basis for calculating aging duration.  While the details of activation energy that equation can be discussed, those details are not necessary for the majority of people.  So, the equation below is how we typically calculated accelerated aging durations.  


    where:
    - TAA is the accelerated aging temperature
    - TS is the standard temperature 
    - Q10 is the aging rate per 10°C.  
    • TAA is governed by material properties and is typically chosen as high as possible to minimize aging time. 
      • Typical temperatures range from 40°C to 60°C. 
      • Increase aging temperature and you're increasing the power to which the Q10 factor is taken, drastically reducing aging time. 
      • TAA = 55°C is often used because it minimizes aging time while ensuring the 60°C threshold called out in ASTM F9180 is not crossed given ± 2°C in allowable fluctuations. 
    • TS is the mean kinetic temperature (more info here) of the product storage environment (sometimes called standard temperature).  
      • Typical values range from 20-25°C. 
      • 25°C is usually the most conservative value.
    • Q10 is typically 2, which means the your aging rate is doubled for every 10°C increase above TS.
      • Increasing this factor will quickly decrease your aging time, but requires objective evidence the materials being tested follow the higher Q10 factor.  
        • Proving this is requires aging studies which take longer than using going with the Q10= 2.
      • The safe bet is to always use 2, unless you have knowledge that is doesn't follow Arrhenius or has a higher Q10 factor 

    Example Calculations
    Given TS = 25°C and Q10 = 2 are the conservative standard, and TAA = 55°C is the most common aging temperature, look what happens to the overall equation:


    Knowing that for most aging you need to divide real time by 8 can help with quick calculations.  Below is a table detailing the number of days needed in a chamber (rounded up of course) at various conditions. 

    Looking at the 1 Year RT (Real Time) row you can see that increasing from TAA 45°C to 55°C halves the aging time required. 

    The Impact of 2°C
    In general, 2°C sounds like a minor temperature fluctuation, but because temperature differences influence the power to which the Q10 factor is taken, it has a big impact.  

    Look at the two calculations below.  One assumes TS = 23°C and the other TS = 25°C.  For 1 year of aging this results in 40 and 46 days, respectively.  That's a difference of 13%.  What's 13% of a year?  Over 47 days (~1.6 months), which would have a significant impact on labeling.  So, it can make a big difference if you're storage conditions are truly closer to 25°C. 


    Closing
    Since you made it to the end here is a link to the Excel file for the aging calculator I made (with bonus finish dates added!).

    I hope this has added to your understanding of accelerated aging of medical devices.  Feel free to comment and provide feedback below.  Part 2 will focus on the role of humidity in aging. 

    Saturday, July 26, 2014

    Rational Engineering

    In my relatively short engineering career I have had the chance to work on a variety of challenges and learn a fair amount about a number of topics.  This is my effort to share my view and what I have learned along the way. 

    Why Rational Engineering?  I think that application of reason and logic usually leads to a solution to most problems.  Overall my approach is fairly simple: learn and improve.  If you don't know something, ask questions and learn it.  If something isn't optimal, determine what can improve it and try it. 

    The topics here will be wide ranging and some may not seem like engineering on the surface.  However, my view is that when you take anything and improve it, you've done some type of problem solving (and all engineering is problem solving).